RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01654
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
He receive all pay, points and benefits/entitlements from
25 Mar 14 through 29 Mar 14.
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He performed a Title 10 Raven Mission; however the Command Manday
Allocation System (CMAS) request was not initiated until after the
mission began; therefore, his request could not be processed.
In support of his request, the applicant provides copies of DD
Form 1351-2, Travel Voucher or Subvoucher for the period 25 Mar
thru 29 Mar 14; AF Form 4327a, Crew Flight (FA) Authorization;
105th Airlift Wing Mission History and various other documents
associated with his request.
The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
According to Special Order P-008506, dated 25 Jul 12, the
applicant enlisted in the New York Air National Guard effective
10 Jul 12.
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
NGB/A1PP recommends approval. The Air Mobility Command (AMC) CMAS
Manager provides a memo from the applicants unit which offers an
explanation of the administrative error in processing the CMAS
request. The Chief, AMC MPA Manager states the documentation
provided reflects the applicant was tasked on 20 Mar 14 to support
Raven Mission number JAM117030185. On 25 Mar 14 he deployed until
29 Mar 14 as tasked; however, without orders.
A1PP recommends the Board direct the applicants records be
corrected to provide compensation of military pay, points,
applicable benefits, travel and per diem for the period 25 Mar
14 through 29 Mar 14.
NGB/A1P concurs with the recommendation of NGB/A1PP.
The complete A1PP and A1P evaluations are at Exhibit B.
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant
on 18 May 15, for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit C).
As of this date, no response has been received by this office.
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of an error or injustice. Having carefully reviewed
this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air
Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale
expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has
been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, we
recommend the applicant's records be corrected as indicated below.
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to the APPLICANT be corrected to show that he was placed
on active duty for the period 25 March 2014 through 29 March 2014.
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number
BC-2014-01654 in Executive Session on 9 Jun 15, under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
All members voted to correct the records as recommended. The
following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket Number
BC-2014-01654 was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 7 Apr 14, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicants Available Personnel Record.
Exhibit C. Letter, NGB/A1PP, dated 7 Apr 15, with atchs.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 18 May 15.
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00884
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00884 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Korean Defense Service Medal (KDSM). AIR FORCE EVALUATION: NGB/A1PP recommends denial of the applicants request for active duty service credit. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice;...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04870
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04870 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Active Guard Reserve (AGR) orders covering the period 1 Apr 06 through 30 Sep 07 be amended to show his permanent duty location as the Roosevelt National Guard Armory, Phoenix, AZ, instead of Tucson International Airport, Tucson, AZ, from 1 Apr 06 through 15 Jul 07, and from 16 Jul 07 through 30 Sep 07 his...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02149
________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The record should be changed because it was created through an administrative error by the finance office and through no fault of her own. The Air Force Financial Services Center Debts and Remissions Branch directed the collection rate of $350.00 per month for seven months until the member's current expired term of service (ETS) date of 20 Nov 2012. After thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00614
Giving the circumstances surrounding the reason for his separation coupled with his honorable service characterization, we believe that a good probability exists that he may be able to provide effective and meaningful service to our nation as a member of the armed forces. THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that on 28 Sep 10, he was discharged with a RE code of 3K (Secretarial Authority). ...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01410
Upon returning from his AD deployment in 2012 he was denied Medical Continuation (MEDCON) orders and pay by his medical group, and he should have been considered for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). On 12 Dec 12, the Connecticut IG rendered a determination that the applicants contested injury was incurred while serving on AD, and, as he was found fit for duty, no MEDCON orders were warranted. A complete copy of the NGB/A1PS evaluation is at Exhibit D. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01566
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01566 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His make-up drill points be transferred to show a good year from Jan 13 to Jan 14. Furthermore, since there was no error or injustice, it would not be appropriate for the AFBCMR to direct the unit to provide the member with the necessary points to show a good year. The complete A1PP evaluation is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00803
The complete A1P evaluation is at Exhibit D. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANTS REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: He was denied promotion because the MS ANG reneged on his assignment orders without advising him just weeks after arriving on station. The resource to promote him to the grade of SMSgt as reflected on his orders was taken away when another member was placed in his position. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01876
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is included at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: NGB/A1P recommends approval, indicating the applicants military records should be corrected to reflect compensation of military pay, points, and applicable benefits for 9 days (25 minus 16), by updating the end date of tour from 10 Apr 14 to 19 Apr 14. Therefore, we recommend the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03094
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03094 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He receive retirement points for the period 27 Sep 10 through 1 Apr 12 rather than Incapacitation Pay (INCAP Pay). In support of his appeal, the applicant provides a personal statement; active duty orders for the period, 2 Jun 26 Sep...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01276
However, as of Jan 14, there was no record of the Article 15 action. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFLOA/JAJM did not provide a recommendation; however, they noted the applicants request should be forwarded to the Air Force Personnel Center to have her DOR reviewed. Exhibit D. Letter, NGB/A1PP, dated 9 Feb 15.